PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTS vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTS vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTS achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than EVLN's 1.43% return.


SPTS

1D
0.10%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
1.62%

EVLN

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.50%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTS vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.58%5.05%4.12%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
1.43%5.59%7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTS and EVLN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTS vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTS vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTSEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.51

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

8.18

+6.07

SPTS vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTS and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTS vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTS drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, which is greater than EVLN's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTS and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTSEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-2.78%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-1.77%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.16%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-0.21%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.54%

-0.32%

Volatility

SPTS vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) at 0.42%. This indicates that SPTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTSEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.42%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.93%

1.64%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

1.87%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

2.41%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.70%

2.41%

-0.71%

SPTS vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPTS vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

SPTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.91%7.28%6.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTS and EVLN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTS has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to EVLN (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTS dropped -5.83% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.42% vs 3.06% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.

SPTS is categorized as Government Bonds, while EVLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTS and 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTS and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer