PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLN vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVLN vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVLN vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
-0.98%5.59%7.29%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.24%5.49%3.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.24% return.


EVLN

1D
0.16%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
0.33%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHO

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
0.24%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVLN vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EVLN vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLN vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLNSCHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

2.49

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

4.00

-1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.51

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.44

-2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.31

17.55

-10.24

EVLN vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLN and SCHO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLNSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.49

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.28

1.00

+1.29

Correlation

The correlation between EVLN and SCHO is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EVLN vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than SCHO's 4.00% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
7.19%7.28%6.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.00%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Drawdowns

EVLN vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and SCHO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLNSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-5.69%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.05%

-0.86%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.45%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.61%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.22%

+0.38%

Volatility

EVLN vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.52%. This indicates that EVLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVLNSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.52%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.87%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

1.52%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

1.97%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

1.55%

+0.88%