PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTM vs. SIXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTM vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 13.99% return.


SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

SIXA

1D
0.07%
1M
0.55%
6M
8.64%
YTD
13.99%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.54M$1.13M$653.60K
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M

SPTM vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%30.62%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
13.99%15.52%22.70%11.98%-5.72%23.87%19.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and SIXA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between SPTM and SIXA has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPTM vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTM
SIXA

Technology

36.3%
17.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.8%

Healthcare

9.3%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.1%

Industrials

8.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

8.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
23.8%

Energy

3.5%
4.9%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Technology

SPTM
36.3%
SIXA
17.0%

Financial Services

SPTM
12.5%
SIXA
12.8%

Healthcare

SPTM
9.3%
SIXA
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTM
9.1%
SIXA
5.1%

Industrials

SPTM
8.8%
SIXA
4.6%

Communication Services

SPTM
8.7%
SIXA
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPTM
4.5%
SIXA
23.8%

Energy

SPTM
3.5%
SIXA
4.9%

Utilities

SPTM
2.6%
SIXA
2.7%

Real Estate

SPTM
2.3%
SIXA
3.8%

Basic Materials

SPTM
2.2%
SIXA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTM vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPTM vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTMSIXADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.36

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

12.79

-2.72

SPTM vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SIXA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTMSIXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-18.38%

-36.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-5.59%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-11.22%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-18.38%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.72%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-2.93%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.47%

+0.52%

Volatility

SPTM vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.77%. This indicates that SPTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTMSIXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.77%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

7.06%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

9.05%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

12.77%

+4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

13.26%

+4.77%

SPTM vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPTM vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SIXA's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
1.99%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTM and SIXA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTM has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to SIXA (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.48% vs 12.48% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.06% for SPTM.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTM and SIXA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer