PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTM vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTM vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.


SPTM

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.21%

DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.10%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%29.60%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.42%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.90

The correlation between SPTM and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTM vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTM
DMAY

Technology

34.0%
36.2%

Financial Services

12.1%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.1%

Industrials

9.4%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.7%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Technology

SPTM
34.0%
DMAY
36.2%

Financial Services

SPTM
12.1%
DMAY
11.9%

Communication Services

SPTM
10.5%
DMAY
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTM
10.3%
DMAY
10.1%

Industrials

SPTM
9.4%
DMAY
8.1%

Healthcare

SPTM
8.6%
DMAY
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPTM
4.8%
DMAY
4.9%

Energy

SPTM
3.7%
DMAY
3.5%

Utilities

SPTM
2.3%
DMAY
2.3%

Real Estate

SPTM
2.3%
DMAY
1.9%

Basic Materials

SPTM
2.0%
DMAY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTM vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPTMDMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.60

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.73

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

22.76

-7.74

SPTM vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPTMDMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.65

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.88

-0.42

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTMDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-13.90%

-40.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-3.36%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-12.38%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-13.90%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.30%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-2.24%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.55%

+1.31%

Volatility

SPTM vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that SPTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTMDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

0.84%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

3.74%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

4.73%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

9.02%

+7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

8.43%

+9.60%

SPTM vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPTM vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPTM and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.85% for DMAY.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTM and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer