SPTL vs. XLF
SPTL (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTL returned -1.12%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for XLF. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. SPTL charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
SPTL vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTL achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTL has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of -1.12%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
SPTL
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.32%
- 10Y*
- -1.12%
XLF
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 1.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
SPTL vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | -0.38% | 5.28% | -6.23% | 3.30% | -29.44% | -4.99% | 18.07% | 13.74% | -1.57% | 9.01% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.64% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTL and XLF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007 | -0.32 |
The correlation between SPTL and XLF shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTL vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
SPTL
XLF
SPTL vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPTL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.02 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.08 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 0.20 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPTL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.08 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.41 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | 0.56 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.20 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SPTL vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTL drawdown since its inception was -46.20%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTL and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -82.69% | +36.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -14.79% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -15.54% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.02% | -25.81% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | -42.86% | -3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.87% | -9.34% | -27.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -20.03% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 5.66% | -2.97% |
Volatility
SPTL vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) is 2.63%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that SPTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 3.29% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 10.94% | -4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.92% | 14.41% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 18.63% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 22.16% | -8.21% |
SPTL vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTL has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTL vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SPTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than XLF's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 4.21% | 4.12% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.56% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTL and XLF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to SPTL (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTL dropped -46.20% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 12.38% vs -1.12% for SPTL. On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTL has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.38% return vs -1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLF.
SPTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.56% for XLF.
SPTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLF is Financials Equities. SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTL and 0.08% for XLF.
SPTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTL and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer