PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTE vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTE achieves a 41.79% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.39% return.


SPTE

1D
-1.21%
1M
17.88%
YTD
41.79%
6M
41.30%
1Y
74.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
41.79%26.37%33.28%5.24%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTE and QQQM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023

0.90

The correlation between SPTE and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTE vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTE
QQQM

Technology

98.6%
53.8%

Industrials

0.3%
2.8%

Healthcare

0.2%
4.2%

Energy

0.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

SPTE
98.6%
QQQM
53.8%

Industrials

SPTE
0.3%
QQQM
2.8%

Healthcare

SPTE
0.2%
QQQM
4.2%

Energy

SPTE
0.1%
QQQM
0.6%

Basic Materials

SPTE

-

QQQM
1.1%

Communication Services

SPTE

-

QQQM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTE

-

QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPTE

-

QQQM
7.7%

Financial Services

SPTE

-

QQQM
0.2%

Real Estate

SPTE

-

QQQM
0.1%

Utilities

SPTE

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTE
SPTE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SPTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPTEQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.45

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

3.53

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.85

13.52

+6.33

SPTE vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTE Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTE and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPTEQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

2.65

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

0.85

+0.89

Drawdowns

SPTE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTE drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTE and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTEQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-35.04%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-11.96%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.20%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-8.25%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.11%

+0.65%

Volatility

SPTE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that SPTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTEQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

4.48%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

12.05%

+5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

15.91%

+6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

22.24%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

22.12%

+3.70%

SPTE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPTE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SPTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
0.67%0.96%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPTE and QQQM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTE has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTE dropped -25.55% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 1-year performance, SPTE leads with 74.41% vs 41.98% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPTE has performed better with a 74.41% return vs 41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPTE.

SPTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

SPTE is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPTE tracks S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPTE and 0.15% for QQQM.

SPTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTE and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer