SPTE vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPTE (SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index, while UMMA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Wahed. SPTE is passively managed, while UMMA is actively managed. Over the past year, SPTE returned 60.97% vs 50.76% for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPTE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

SPTE vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTE achieves a 33.89% return, which is significantly higher than UMMA's 29.52% return.

SPTE

• 1D: -4.87%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 33.89%
• 6M: 34.44%
• 1Y: 60.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -5.07%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 29.52%
• 6M: 30.57%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTE vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF	33.89%	26.37%	33.28%	5.52%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	29.52%	26.65%	4.67%	4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTE and UMMA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.82

The correlation between SPTE and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTE vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPTE	UMMA
Technology	98.9%	48.2%
Healthcare	0.3%	14.8%
Industrials	0.2%	12.1%
Energy	0.1%	2.4%
Basic Materials	-	8.8%
Communication Services	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SPTE vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTE

SPTE Risk / Return Rank: 78
SPTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SPTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPTE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SPTE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 70
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTE vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPTE	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.24	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.88	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	3.42	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	13.07	+2.27

SPTE vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTE and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPTE vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTE drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTE and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTE	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.55%	-34.17%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-14.93%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-5.07%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-9.73%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.89%	+0.10%

Volatility

SPTE vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) at 12.08%. This indicates that SPTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTE	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.37%	12.08%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.12%	20.30%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.86%	22.74%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.64%	21.08%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.64%	21.08%	+5.56%

SPTE vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPTE vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

SPTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than UMMA's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF	0.71%	0.96%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.95%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTE and UMMA in my portfolio?

SPTE and UMMA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPTE or UMMA?

SPTE has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to UMMA (12.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTE dropped -25.55% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, SPTE or UMMA?

On 1-year performance, SPTE leads with 60.97% vs 50.76% for UMMA. On fees, SPTE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, UMMA has been the lower-risk option at 12.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTE or UMMA?

Over the 1-year period, SPTE has performed better with a 60.97% return vs 50.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTE or UMMA?

SPTE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTE or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.71% for SPTE.

What is the main difference between SPTE and UMMA?

SPTE is categorized as Technology Equities, while UMMA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPTE and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.