PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. DFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.33% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 14.69% return.


SPSM

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.27%
YTD
19.33%
6M
16.91%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
11.47%

DFAS

1D
-0.91%
1M
2.82%
YTD
14.69%
6M
12.40%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.33%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%1.14%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
14.69%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and DFAS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.99

The correlation between SPSM and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
DFAS

Technology

17.1%
15.1%

Financial Services

16.5%
19.2%

Industrials

15.2%
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
13.0%

Healthcare

11.0%
12.0%

Real Estate

7.6%
0.7%

Energy

5.4%
6.4%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.8%

Technology

SPSM
17.1%
DFAS
15.1%

Financial Services

SPSM
16.5%
DFAS
19.2%

Industrials

SPSM
15.2%
DFAS
18.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.1%
DFAS
13.0%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
DFAS
12.0%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.6%
DFAS
0.7%

Energy

SPSM
5.4%
DFAS
6.4%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.0%
DFAS
5.2%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.7%
DFAS
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.6%
DFAS
4.2%

Utilities

SPSM
1.9%
DFAS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMDFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

3.06

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

10.51

+2.94

SPSM vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and DFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMDFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-26.13%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-9.36%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-26.13%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-26.13%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-1.03%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-8.23%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.72%

-0.14%

Volatility

SPSM vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMDFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.84%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.96%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

17.00%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

20.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

20.82%

+2.17%

SPSM vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than DFAS's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.91%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.41%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPSM and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPSM has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to DFAS (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

On 5-year performance, DFAS leads with 7.86% vs 6.36% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.91% for DFAS.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.26% for DFAS.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and DFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer