SPSM vs. DFAS
SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SPSM is passively managed, while DFAS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPSM returned 6.36%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for DFAS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPSM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DFAS.
Performance
SPSM vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.33% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 14.69% return.
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 19.33%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.33% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 1.14% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 14.69% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and DFAS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SPSM and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPSM vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPSM
DFAS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
SPSM
DFAS
Financial Services
SPSM
DFAS
Industrials
SPSM
DFAS
Consumer Cyclical
SPSM
DFAS
Healthcare
SPSM
DFAS
Real Estate
SPSM
DFAS
Energy
SPSM
DFAS
Basic Materials
SPSM
DFAS
Communication Services
SPSM
DFAS
Consumer Defensive
SPSM
DFAS
Utilities
SPSM
DFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
DFAS
SPSM vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPSM | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.06 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 10.51 | +2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and DFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -26.13% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -9.36% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -26.13% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -26.13% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.03% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -8.23% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.72% | -0.14% |
Volatility
SPSM vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 4.84% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 11.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 17.00% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 20.81% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 20.82% | +2.17% |
SPSM vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPSM vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than DFAS's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.91% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPSM and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPSM has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to DFAS (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs DFAS's -26.13%.
On 5-year performance, DFAS leads with 7.86% vs 6.36% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.91% for DFAS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.26% for DFAS.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and DFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer