SPRE vs. RPAR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPRE (SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPRE is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global All Equity REIT Shariah Capped Index, while RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. SPRE is passively managed, while RPAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPRE returned 1.62%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for RPAR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPRE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.

Performance

SPRE vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPRE having a 7.88% return and RPAR slightly higher at 8.04%.

SPRE

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.70%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 1.62%
• 10Y*: —

RPAR

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 9.39%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPRE vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPRE SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF	7.88%	3.07%	2.11%	9.40%	-29.48%	44.78%	0.73%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	8.04%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	7.56%	0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SPRE and RPAR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020	0.48

The correlation between SPRE and RPAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPRE vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPRE	RPAR
Real Estate	84.4%	-0.0%
Basic Materials	5.0%	6.4%
Utilities	0.4%	0.2%
Financial Services	0.1%	35.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Energy	-	5.9%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	2.1%
Technology	-	0.1%
Communication Services	-0.0%	4.9%

Return for Risk

SPRE vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPRE

SPRE Risk / Return Rank: 24
SPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 27

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 58
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPRE vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPRE	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.12	-1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.95	-1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.38	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	2.65	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	8.82	-4.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPRE vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPRE and RPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPRE	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	2.12	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.17	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.37	-0.12

Drawdowns

SPRE vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPRE drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, which is greater than RPAR's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPRE and RPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPRE	RPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.34%	-30.16%	-8.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-8.10%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.04%	-13.20%	-8.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.34%	-30.16%	-8.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.42%	-2.17%	-10.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.93%	-11.62%	-6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.44%	+0.39%

Volatility

SPRE vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.57%. This indicates that SPRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPRE	RPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.57%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	8.38%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	10.19%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	12.40%	+6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	12.69%	+5.73%

SPRE vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPRE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPRE vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

SPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than RPAR's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.06%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%
SPRE SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF	3.86%	4.10%	4.13%	4.16%	4.17%	2.83%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPRE and RPAR in my portfolio?

SPRE and RPAR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPRE or RPAR?

SPRE has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to RPAR (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPRE dropped -38.34% vs RPAR's -30.16%.

Which ETF is better, SPRE or RPAR?

On 5-year performance, RPAR leads with 2.06% vs 1.62% for SPRE. On fees, RPAR is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPRE or RPAR?

Over the 5-year period, RPAR has performed better with a 2.06% return vs 1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPRE or RPAR?

RPAR is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SPRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPRE or RPAR?

SPRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.06% for RPAR.

What is the main difference between SPRE and RPAR?

SPRE is categorized as REIT, while RPAR is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SPRE and 0.51% for RPAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.