PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPRE vs. SRET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPRE vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPRE achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 5.39% return.


SPRE

1D
0.19%
1M
0.70%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.31%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*

SRET

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.79%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
1.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPRE vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPRE
SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF
10.27%3.07%2.11%9.40%-29.48%44.78%-0.17%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
5.39%18.09%-1.55%9.85%-18.24%14.00%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SPRE and SRET is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

0.70

The correlation between SPRE and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPRE vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPRE
SPRE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SRET
SRET Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPRE vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPRESRETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.64

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

6.77

-1.98

SPRE vs. SRET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the SRET Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPRE and SRET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPRE vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPRE drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPRE and SRET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPRESRETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.34%

-66.98%

+28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-9.48%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

-18.87%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.34%

-29.43%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-23.02%

+12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-22.48%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.30%

+0.48%

Volatility

SPRE vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.72%. This indicates that SPRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPRESRETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

3.72%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

9.15%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

11.54%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

16.49%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

24.60%

-6.20%

SPRE vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPRE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPRE vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

SPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than SRET's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPRE
SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF
3.78%4.10%4.13%4.16%4.17%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
7.99%7.98%8.72%7.21%8.30%6.33%8.88%7.83%8.54%8.20%8.08%7.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPRE and SRET have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPRE has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to SRET (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPRE dropped -38.34% vs SRET's -66.98%.

On 5-year performance, SPRE leads with 1.86% vs 1.69% for SRET. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPRE has performed better with a 1.86% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SPRE.

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.99%, compared with 3.78% for SPRE.

SPRE tracks S&P Global All Equity REIT Shariah Capped Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SPRE and 0.58% for SRET.

SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPRE and SRET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer