PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPPP vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPPP vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
-7.36%89.43%-5.83%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-3.45%18.62%19.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's -3.45% return.


SPPP

1D
0.45%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
14.96%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
-4.12%
10Y*
9.32%

QQQI

1D
1.01%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPPP vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPPP vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP
SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPPPQQQIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.68

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.93

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.58

8.69

-4.10

SPPP vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPPPQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.90

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP and QQQI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPPP vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%.


TTM20252024
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.90%13.82%12.85%

Drawdowns

SPPP vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and QQQI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPPQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-20.00%

-39.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-11.46%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

-5.72%

-25.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-2.31%

-24.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.43%

2.54%

+9.89%

Volatility

SPPP vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) has a higher volatility of 15.09% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.18%. This indicates that SPPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPPPQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.09%

6.18%

+8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.37%

11.23%

+35.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.37%

19.72%

+29.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.37%

17.48%

+16.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.87%

17.48%

+15.39%