SPPP vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPPP returned 6.36% vs 279.21% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. SPPP charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -25.48% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.

SPPP

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -17.16%
• YTD: -25.48%
• 6M: -30.01%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: 3.47%
• 5Y*: -7.64%
• 10Y*: 6.70%

MSTZ

• 1D: 19.27%
• 1M: 186.45%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 279.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	-25.48%	89.43%	-13.69%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	1.05%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP and MSTZ is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.23

Return for Risk

SPPP vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP

SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 11
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPPP	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	1.93	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	2.48	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.32	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	3.31	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	6.57	-6.26

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPPP	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.09%	-99.38%	+40.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.66%	-84.89%	+39.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.42%	-96.56%	+52.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-94.46%	+67.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.18%	42.70%	-22.52%

Volatility

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is 12.63%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that SPPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPPP	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.63%	46.08%	-33.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.29%	129.73%	-83.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.74%	145.84%	-94.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.13%	170.65%	-135.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.29%	170.65%	-137.36%

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPPP vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPP nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPPP and MSTZ in my portfolio?

SPPP and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPPP or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to SPPP (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPPP dropped -59.09% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPPP or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs 6.36% for SPPP. On fees, SPPP is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, SPPP has been the lower-risk option at 12.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPPP or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPPP or MSTZ?

SPPP is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPPP or MSTZ?

SPPP and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SPPP and MSTZ?

SPPP is categorized as Precious Metals, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for SPPP and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.