PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a -18.18% return, which is significantly lower than AUCP.L's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP.L has underperformed AUCP.L with an annualized return of 4.80%, while AUCP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.


SPPP.L

1D
1.11%
1M
-15.89%
YTD
-18.18%
6M
-29.79%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
4.80%

AUCP.L

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.29%
YTD
-10.22%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
55.82%
3Y*
45.12%
5Y*
23.87%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
-18.18%104.81%-8.43%-10.70%24.01%-10.35%7.05%17.67%-9.95%-6.88%
AUCP.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-10.22%161.99%20.20%8.69%-4.04%-8.91%17.60%39.53%-5.63%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP.L and AUCP.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.51

The correlation between SPPP.L and AUCP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (5 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP.L
SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AUCP.L
AUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPPP.LAUCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.56

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

4.09

-2.77

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the AUCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and AUCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum AUCP.L drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and AUCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPP.LAUCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-81.66%

+36.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.01%

-35.61%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.01%

-35.61%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-39.38%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

-45.72%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.37%

-32.88%

-8.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-45.85%

+26.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.67%

13.60%

+5.07%

Volatility

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) is 9.95%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that SPPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPP.LAUCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

17.90%

-7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.30%

37.14%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.58%

46.44%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

39.29%

-8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

36.09%

-8.30%

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPPP.L vs. AUCP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPP.L nor AUCP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPPP.L and AUCP.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPPP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPPP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.

SPPP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while AUCP.L is Gold. SPPP.L tracks Platinum, while AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SPPP.L and 0.55% for AUCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPP.L and AUCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer