SPOT vs. MLPX
SPOT (Spotify Technology S.A.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, SPOT returned 16.93%/yr vs 22.92%/yr for MLPX. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SPOT vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOT achieves a -13.91% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 26.75% return.
SPOT
- 1D
- -4.34%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- -20.28%
- 3Y*
- 49.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.17%
MLPX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 17.40%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.85M | $35.99M | $31.05M | |
| $931.26M | $810.43M | $959.57M |
SPOT vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | -13.91% | 29.80% | 138.08% | 138.01% | -66.27% | -25.62% | 110.40% | 31.76% | -31.59% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.75% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOT and MLPX is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SPOT and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOT vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
SPOT
MLPX
SPOT vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOT | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.29 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 3.27 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 7.63 | -8.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOT vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOT drawdown since its inception was -80.51%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOT and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOT | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.51% | -70.67% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.11% | -8.18% | -35.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -16.77% | -30.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.39% | -19.72% | -56.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.57% | -3.27% | -32.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.98% | -16.47% | -14.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.21% | 3.49% | +23.72% |
Volatility
SPOT vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.46%. This indicates that SPOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOT | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 5.46% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.00% | 12.52% | +25.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.58% | 15.68% | +27.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.62% | 19.90% | +27.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.19% | 26.14% | +21.05% |
Dividends
SPOT vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.05% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOT and MLPX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPOT has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to MLPX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPOT dropped -80.51% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPOT and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer