SPMV vs. RSPG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPMV (Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

SPMV vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPMV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPG

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 34.68%
• 6M: 28.63%
• 1Y: 50.95%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 21.17%
• 10Y*: 9.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF	0.87%	11.69%	18.78%	10.28%	-10.84%	24.35%	8.57%	32.13%	-6.28%	7.84%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	34.68%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV and RSPG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017	0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between SPMV and RSPG has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPMV vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPMV	RSPG
Technology	26.9%	-
Financial Services	17.8%	0.0%
Healthcare	15.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	-
Communication Services	6.5%	-
Industrials	6.0%	-
Energy	4.8%	100.0%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

SPMV vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 70
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPMV	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.18	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMV	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-79.98%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.38%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.46%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPMV	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	21.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	28.31%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	33.56%	—

SPMV vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPMV vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

SPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than RSPG's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.94%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF	1.45%	1.53%	1.53%	2.28%	1.79%	1.28%	1.71%	3.13%	2.11%	1.72%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPMV and RSPG in my portfolio?

SPMV and RSPG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPMV or RSPG?

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPMV or RSPG?

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPMV or RSPG?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.45% for SPMV.

What is the main difference between SPMV and RSPG?

SPMV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPMV and 0.40% for RSPG.