PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMV vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPMV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LGLV

1D
0.66%
1M
2.56%
6M
4.07%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
6.57%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV and LGLV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between SPMV and LGLV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPMV vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMV
LGLV

Technology

26.9%
9.4%

Financial Services

17.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

15.0%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
9.1%

Communication Services

6.5%
4.3%

Industrials

6.0%
18.4%

Energy

4.8%
3.5%

Utilities

2.8%
11.6%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
17.6%

Technology

SPMV
26.9%
LGLV
9.4%

Financial Services

SPMV
17.8%
LGLV
9.9%

Healthcare

SPMV
15.0%
LGLV
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPMV
10.7%
LGLV
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMV
6.6%
LGLV
9.1%

Communication Services

SPMV
6.5%
LGLV
4.3%

Industrials

SPMV
6.0%
LGLV
18.4%

Energy

SPMV
4.8%
LGLV
3.5%

Utilities

SPMV
2.8%
LGLV
11.6%

Basic Materials

SPMV
2.6%
LGLV
3.5%

Real Estate

SPMV
0.2%
LGLV
17.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMV vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMVLGLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

SPMV vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMVLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

Volatility

SPMV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMVLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

SPMV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.01%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMV and LGLV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LGLV.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

SPMV is categorized as S&P 500, while LGLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while LGLV tracks State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPMV and 0.12% for LGLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMV and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer