SPMO vs. WGROX
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) are both funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.24%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for WGROX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WGROX.
Performance
SPMO vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 21.65% return, which is significantly higher than WGROX's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 20.24%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.48%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- YTD
- 21.65%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 37.58%
- 5Y*
- 20.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.04%
WGROX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.08%
SPMO vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.65% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 5.21% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 33.43% | -30.86% | 20.76% | 36.73% | 33.31% | -3.75% | 24.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and WGROX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SPMO and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
WGROX
SPMO vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.00 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.14 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | -0.36 | +7.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and WGROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -61.61% | +30.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -15.58% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -27.61% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -40.16% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -40.16% | +9.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.60% | -14.65% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -9.91% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 6.14% | -2.35% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) at 5.79%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 5.79% | +5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 14.75% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.65% | 19.67% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 23.12% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 23.31% | -2.47% |
SPMO vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than WGROX's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 8.13% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and WGROX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to WGROX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs WGROX's -61.61%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and WGROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer