SPMO vs. SPXN

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SPXN is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 21.24%/yr vs 16.16%/yr for SPXN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPXN.

Performance

SPMO vs. SPXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 32.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPXN's 12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed SPXN with an annualized return of 21.24%, while SPXN has yielded a comparatively lower 16.16% annualized return.

SPMO

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: 10.01%
• YTD: 32.66%
• 6M: 33.70%
• 1Y: 50.00%
• 3Y*: 43.16%
• 5Y*: 24.34%
• 10Y*: 21.24%

SPXN

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 13.30%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. SPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	32.66%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	22.64%	28.25%	25.93%	-0.92%	27.76%
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	12.64%	18.74%	24.35%	28.57%	-18.87%	27.04%	22.15%	31.50%	-3.85%	20.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and SPXN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.74

The correlation between SPMO and SPXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMO vs. SPXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPMO	SPXN
Technology	54.9%	43.7%
Industrials	11.1%	9.1%
Communication Services	8.2%	11.7%
Healthcare	6.4%	10.1%
Financial Services	5.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	5.5%
Energy	3.1%	3.8%
Utilities	2.5%	3.0%
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	11.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

SPMO vs. SPXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 85
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SPXN

SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 78
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. SPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPMO	SPXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.37	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.14	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.43	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	3.40	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.96	14.99	-0.03

SPMO vs. SPXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the SPXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and SPXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. SPXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXN drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SPXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMO	SPXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.95%	-32.10%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-9.26%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-19.56%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.74%	-24.47%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.95%	-32.10%	+1.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.41%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-4.00%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.10%	+1.25%

Volatility

SPMO vs. SPXN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) at 5.00%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPMO	SPXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.78%	5.00%	+5.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.04%	10.59%	+6.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.78%	13.30%	+6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.71%	17.26%	+2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.52%	17.70%	+2.82%

SPMO vs. SPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXN's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPMO vs. SPXN - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than SPXN's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.64%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF	0.88%	0.98%	1.12%	1.19%	1.35%	0.94%	1.09%	1.41%	1.76%	1.54%	2.60%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPMO and SPXN in my portfolio?

SPMO and SPXN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPMO or SPXN?

SPMO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to SPXN (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SPXN's -32.10%.

Which ETF is better, SPMO or SPXN?

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.24% vs 16.16% for SPXN. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPMO or SPXN?

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPMO or SPXN?

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPMO or SPXN?

SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.64% for SPMO.

What is the main difference between SPMO and SPXN?

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SPXN is S&P 500. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.09% for SPXN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.