SPMO vs. SLVP
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
SPMO vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 20.86%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
SPMO vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and SLVP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SPMO and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
SLVP
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
SLVP
-
Industrials
SPMO
SLVP
-
Communication Services
SPMO
SLVP
-
Healthcare
SPMO
SLVP
-
Financial Services
SPMO
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
SLVP
-
Energy
SPMO
SLVP
-
Utilities
SPMO
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
SLVP
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
SLVP
-
Real Estate
SPMO
SLVP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
SLVP
SPMO vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.21 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 5.86 | +7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -80.47% | +49.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -38.06% | +25.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -38.06% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -54.26% | +31.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -62.03% | +31.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -31.74% | +30.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -46.78% | +42.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 14.31% | -10.96% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 19.61% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 45.17% | -28.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 54.53% | -35.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 43.15% | -23.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 42.45% | -21.97% |
SPMO vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SLVP's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and SLVP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 12.67% for SLVP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SLVP is Silver. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.39% for SLVP.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer