SPMO vs. SGRT
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. SPMO is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
SPMO vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 44.22% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
SGRT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 44.22%
- 6M
- 48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 3.55% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 44.22% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and SGRT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -17.87% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -4.78% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -3.24% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility
SPMO vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 34.85% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 34.85% | -15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 34.85% | -14.37% |
SPMO vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and SGRT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer