SPMO vs. QQQM
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPMO returned 24.29%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
SPMO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.39% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 1.19% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and QQQM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SPMO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
QQQM
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
SPMO
QQQM
Industrials
SPMO
QQQM
Communication Services
SPMO
QQQM
Healthcare
SPMO
QQQM
Financial Services
SPMO
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
QQQM
Energy
SPMO
QQQM
Utilities
SPMO
QQQM
Basic Materials
SPMO
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
QQQM
Real Estate
SPMO
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
QQQM
SPMO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.62 | 2.65 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 3.46 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.53 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 13.52 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.65 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.82 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.85 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -35.04% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -11.96% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -22.70% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -35.04% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -8.25% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.11% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 4.48% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 12.05% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 15.91% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.24% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 22.12% | -1.81% |
SPMO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 18.07% for QQQM. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer