SPMO vs. ESPO
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPMO returned 20.21%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for ESPO. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
SPMO vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -9.09% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.93%
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -11.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $331.54M | $346.70M | $350.59M |
SPMO vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.07% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -12.05% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and ESPO is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPMO and ESPO has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPMO vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
ESPO
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
ESPO
Industrials
SPMO
ESPO
-
Communication Services
SPMO
ESPO
Healthcare
SPMO
ESPO
-
Financial Services
SPMO
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
ESPO
-
Energy
SPMO
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
ESPO
-
Utilities
SPMO
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
ESPO
Real Estate
SPMO
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
ESPO
SPMO vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.92 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.39 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | -0.62 | +6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -50.99% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.64% | -29.43% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -29.43% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -48.33% | +25.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -22.03% | +11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -15.23% | +10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 18.32% | -14.03% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 6.66%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.53% | 6.66% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 16.07% | +5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 19.65% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 25.12% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 25.65% | -4.73% |
SPMO vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than ESPO's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and ESPO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.21% vs 8.32% for ESPO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while ESPO is Gaming. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.55% for ESPO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer