PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.23% return.


SPMO

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.57%
YTD
23.98%
6M
22.84%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
40.17%
5Y*
22.76%
10Y*
20.35%

ESPO

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-15.23%
6M
-18.59%
1Y
-15.04%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
23.98%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-12.05%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.23%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and ESPO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.63

The correlation between SPMO and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPMO vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
ESPO

Technology

54.8%
8.2%

Industrials

10.9%

-

Communication Services

8.7%
78.1%

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Financial Services

5.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
13.8%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

SPMO
54.8%
ESPO
8.2%

Industrials

SPMO
10.9%
ESPO

-

Communication Services

SPMO
8.7%
ESPO
78.1%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.2%
ESPO

-

Financial Services

SPMO
5.7%
ESPO

-

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
ESPO

-

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
ESPO

-

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
ESPO

-

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
ESPO

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
ESPO
13.8%

Real Estate

SPMO
0.9%
ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.88

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

-0.54

+3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

-0.96

+12.83

SPMO vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOESPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

-0.80

+2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.22

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.62

+0.36

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-50.99%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-27.81%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-27.81%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-48.33%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-27.30%

+22.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-15.05%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

15.67%

-12.36%

Volatility

SPMO vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.82%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

4.82%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

14.65%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

18.81%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

25.11%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

25.73%

-5.32%

SPMO vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and ESPO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to ESPO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 22.76% vs 5.52% for ESPO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 22.76% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.55% for ESPO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer