PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -37.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 20.86%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
3.36%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

CRM

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-37.06%
6M
-36.31%
1Y
-35.16%
3Y*
-6.88%
5Y*
-6.82%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-37.06%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and CRM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between SPMO and CRM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

-0.95

+4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

-1.78

+14.79

SPMO vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-70.50%

+39.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-39.36%

+26.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-54.70%

+34.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-58.62%

+35.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-58.62%

+27.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-54.33%

+52.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-16.15%

+11.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

20.92%

-17.57%

Volatility

SPMO vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

16.76%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

31.59%

-14.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

38.09%

-18.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

37.07%

-17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

35.38%

-14.90%

Dividends

SPMO vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than CRM's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
1.28%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and CRM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs CRM's -70.50%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer