PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. BTGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.


SPMO

1D
2.50%
1M
2.83%
YTD
24.29%
6M
22.86%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
40.28%
5Y*
23.06%
10Y*
20.38%

BTGD

1D
5.44%
1M
-28.40%
YTD
-32.80%
6M
-33.78%
1Y
-31.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
24.29%26.58%1.64%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-32.80%34.62%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and BTGD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOBTGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.93

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

-0.60

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

-1.29

+13.31

SPMO vs. BTGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the BTGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and BTGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOBTGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

-0.57

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.19

+0.79

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and BTGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOBTGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-53.31%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-53.31%

+40.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-50.77%

+46.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-14.85%

+10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

24.72%

-21.42%

Volatility

SPMO vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 9.44%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOBTGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

14.85%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

46.45%

-30.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

56.04%

-37.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

55.94%

-36.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

55.94%

-35.53%

SPMO vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
5.00%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and BTGD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to SPMO (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs BTGD's -53.31%.

On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 39.53% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 39.53% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 1.00% for BTGD.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and BTGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer