PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPMO vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPMO vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.95%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

SPMO vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 20.95%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.60% annualized return.

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and BNO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.16

The correlation between SPMO and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with SPMO:
SPMO vs. VOOSPMO vs. QQQSPMO vs. SCHGSPMO vs. MTUMSPMO vs. VUGSPMO vs. VFMOSPMO vs. XMMO
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

SPMO vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPMOBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.23

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

2.73

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

5.17

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.17

9.76

+4.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPMO vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPMOBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.23

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.69

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.37

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.14

+0.87

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPMOBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-87.06%

+56.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-17.87%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-23.75%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-33.70%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-75.18%

+44.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.29%

+10.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-40.17%

+35.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

9.45%

-6.19%

Volatility

SPMO vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 7.35%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPMOBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

14.22%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

36.10%

-21.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

41.46%

-23.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

35.38%

-16.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

36.68%

-16.37%

SPMO vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPMO vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPMO and BNO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while BNO is Oil & Gas. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.90% for BNO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer