PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPLV having a 8.03% annualized return and XYLD not far ahead at 8.23%.


SPLV

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
2.41%
6M
3.70%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
8.03%

XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.41%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and XYLD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and XYLD has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPLV vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
XYLD

Utilities

26.8%
2.3%

Financial Services

16.6%
11.8%

Real Estate

14.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
4.9%

Industrials

10.1%
8.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.2%

Technology

4.6%
35.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Energy

0.9%
3.5%

Communication Services

0.9%
11.2%

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
XYLD
2.3%

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
XYLD
11.8%

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
XYLD
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
XYLD
4.9%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
XYLD
8.3%

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
XYLD
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
XYLD
10.2%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
XYLD
35.6%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
XYLD
1.8%

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
XYLD
3.5%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
XYLD
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.59

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

3.15

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

16.73

-16.23

SPLV vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

2.53

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.68

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-33.46%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-5.29%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-15.53%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-18.66%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-33.46%

-2.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-0.64%

-5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-3.72%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

0.99%

+2.12%

Volatility

SPLV vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.33%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

1.33%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

5.46%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

6.60%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

11.23%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

14.21%

+1.17%

SPLV vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPLV vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.20%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and XYLD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.23% vs 8.03% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 2.20% for SPLV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while XYLD is Derivative Income. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer