PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.01%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.32%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and SPYM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and SPYM has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPLV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
SPYM

Utilities

26.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

16.6%
11.1%

Real Estate

14.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
4.6%

Industrials

10.1%
7.6%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.9%

Technology

4.6%
38.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Energy

0.9%
3.2%

Communication Services

0.9%
10.6%

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
SPYM
2.5%

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
SPYM
11.1%

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
SPYM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
SPYM
4.6%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
SPYM
7.6%

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
SPYM
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
SPYM
9.9%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
SPYM
38.5%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
SPYM
1.7%

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
SPYM
3.2%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
SPYM
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.44

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

3.17

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

14.76

-14.77

SPLV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

2.39

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.62

+0.06

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-54.46%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-8.90%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-18.72%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-24.48%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-33.87%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-0.66%

-6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-7.15%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

1.91%

+1.14%

Volatility

SPLV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.83%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

8.90%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

11.80%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

16.80%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

18.00%

-2.64%

SPLV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.22%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 8.01% for SPLV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer