SPLV vs. FDV
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. SPLV is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPLV returned 7.54%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for FDV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
SPLV vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than FDV's 11.72% return.
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | 2.53% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and FDV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SPLV and FDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPLV vs. FDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLV
FDV
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLV
FDV
Financial Services
SPLV
FDV
Real Estate
SPLV
FDV
Consumer Defensive
SPLV
FDV
Industrials
SPLV
FDV
Healthcare
SPLV
FDV
Consumer Cyclical
SPLV
FDV
Technology
SPLV
FDV
Basic Materials
SPLV
FDV
Energy
SPLV
FDV
Communication Services
SPLV
FDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
FDV
SPLV vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLV | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.78 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 12.05 | -12.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLV | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.01 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.82 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -16.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -16.70% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -5.70% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -12.55% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -0.39% | -6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -3.93% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) at 2.82%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.82% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 6.82% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 10.74% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 12.65% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 12.65% | +2.71% |
SPLV vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLV vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FDV's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and FDV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FDV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs FDV's -16.70%.
On 3-year performance, FDV leads with 14.78% vs 7.54% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDV has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.22% for SPLV.
SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.50% for FDV.
FDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer