SPLS vs. GHTA
SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) and GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLS charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for GHTA.
Performance
SPLS vs. GHTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPLS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHTA
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLS vs. GHTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 9.75% |
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLS and GHTA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLS vs. GHTA — Risk / Return Rank
SPLS
GHTA
SPLS vs. GHTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLS | GHTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.59 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
SPLS vs. GHTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLS drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, smaller than the maximum GHTA drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLS and GHTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLS | GHTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -13.92% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.63% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -3.51% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
SPLS vs. GHTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLS | GHTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 8.11% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 11.94% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 11.94% | +3.00% |
SPLS vs. GHTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GHTA's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLS vs. GHTA - Dividend Comparison
SPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than GHTA's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.75% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLS and GHTA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.
GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Goose Hollow. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPLS and 1.21% for GHTA.
Find the right allocation for SPLS and GHTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer