PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLB vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLB vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLB has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 2.23%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.93% annualized return.


SPLB

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.50%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
2.23%

VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLB vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.92%7.05%-1.74%11.20%-25.68%-1.99%13.47%23.49%-7.35%12.26%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLB and VCIT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.81

The correlation between SPLB and VCIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLB vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLB
SPLB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLB vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLBVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.08

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

6.95

-3.47

SPLB vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLB and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLBVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.50

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.19

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.47

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.75

-0.31

Drawdowns

SPLB vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLBVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-20.56%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-2.96%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-6.11%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-20.56%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-20.56%

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.53%

-1.36%

-13.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-3.16%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

0.88%

+1.30%

Volatility

SPLB vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.38%. This indicates that SPLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLBVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

1.38%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

3.06%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

4.10%

+3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

6.61%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.95%

6.28%

+6.67%

SPLB vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLB vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.38%5.25%5.20%4.60%4.53%3.00%3.01%3.79%4.50%4.06%4.34%4.70%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPLB and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPLB has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 10-year performance, VCIT leads with 2.93% vs 2.23% for SPLB. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 2.93% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPLB.

SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 4.80% for VCIT.

SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPLB and 0.04% for VCIT.

VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLB and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer