SPLB vs. SPIB
SPLB (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF) and SPIB (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from State Street - SPLB tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index while SPIB tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLB returned 2.19%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for SPIB. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
SPLB vs. SPIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPIB's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLB has underperformed SPIB with an annualized return of 2.19%, while SPIB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.
SPLB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
SPIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
SPLB vs. SPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.28% | 7.05% | -1.74% | 11.20% | -25.68% | -1.99% | 13.47% | 23.49% | -7.35% | 12.26% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 7.91% | 4.28% | 7.27% | -9.65% | -1.24% | 7.69% | 10.23% | -0.49% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLB and SPIB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SPLB and SPIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.90 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLB vs. SPIB — Risk / Return Rank
SPLB
SPIB
SPLB vs. SPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLB | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.34 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 7.83 | -4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLB vs. SPIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than SPIB's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and SPIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLB | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.46% | -14.94% | -19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -2.02% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.91% | -3.18% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.46% | -14.80% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.46% | -14.94% | -19.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.23% | -0.78% | -13.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -1.90% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 0.60% | +1.62% |
Volatility
SPLB vs. SPIB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) at 0.91%. This indicates that SPLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLB | SPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 0.91% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 2.19% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.96% | 2.86% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 4.48% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 4.60% | +8.36% |
SPLB vs. SPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPLB and SPIB have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLB vs. SPIB - Dividend Comparison
SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than SPIB's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.42% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.36% | 5.25% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLB and SPIB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLB has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to SPIB (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs SPIB's -14.94%.
On 10-year performance, SPIB leads with 2.79% vs 2.19% for SPLB. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPIB has performed better with a 2.79% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLB and SPIB have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 4.46% for SPIB.
SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while SPIB tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate.
SPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLB and SPIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer