SPIT vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SPIT is actively managed, while VONG is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPIT charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

SPIT vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.17% return.

SPIT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 23.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VONG

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 6.52%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 24.92%
• 5Y*: 15.38%
• 10Y*: 18.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	25.30%	5.20%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	7.17%	0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and VONG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

SPIT vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 41
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIT vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPIT	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.90	+1.10

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPIT	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.49%	-32.72%	+20.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.23%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-1.66%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-4.88%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPIT	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.35%	15.37%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.35%	21.33%	+5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.35%	20.87%	+5.48%

SPIT vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPIT vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.73%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPIT and VONG in my portfolio?

SPIT and VONG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPIT or VONG?

On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPIT or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPIT or VONG?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

What is the main difference between SPIT and VONG?

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.06% for VONG.