PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIT vs. GBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIT vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 1.42% return.


SPIT

1D
-1.85%
1M
3.31%
YTD
25.30%
6M
23.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and GBIL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIT vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIT

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIT vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPIT vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPITGBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

4.87

-2.87

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and GBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPITGBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-0.76%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-0.04%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

SPIT vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPITGBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.35%

0.23%

+26.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.35%

0.58%

+25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.35%

0.47%

+25.88%

SPIT vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIT vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than GBIL's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.74%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%
SPIT
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
5.73%7.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIT and GBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 3.74% for GBIL.

SPIT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.12% for GBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIT and GBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer