PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIP vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIP vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIP has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 2.61%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


SPIP

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
2.61%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
1.49%6.78%2.35%2.98%-12.84%5.80%11.41%9.14%-1.53%3.16%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and XLE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.10

The correlation between SPIP and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIP vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIP
SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPIPXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.75

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

10.92

-3.77

SPIP vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPIPXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.21

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.79

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.31

+0.22

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIPXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-71.26%

+55.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-12.05%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-20.14%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-26.04%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

-66.81%

+51.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-6.15%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-17.98%

+13.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

4.14%

-3.44%

Volatility

SPIP vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) is 0.95%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that SPIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIPXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

8.25%

-7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

16.58%

-14.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

20.53%

-16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

26.02%

-19.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

29.59%

-23.58%

SPIP vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIP vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
4.75%4.09%3.36%3.70%7.05%4.53%1.97%2.91%2.80%3.02%1.88%0.14%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIP and XLE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to SPIP (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 2.61% for SPIP. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SPIP.

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

SPIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIP and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer