PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIP vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIP vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than VTP's 0.82% return.


SPIP

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.48%
6M
0.52%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.38%

VTP

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.57%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and VTP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.96

The correlation between SPIP and VTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIP vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIP
SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIPVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.70

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

4.86

-0.47

SPIP vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the VTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and VTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIPVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-1.92%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-1.92%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-1.01%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-0.53%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.67%

+0.05%

Volatility

SPIP vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIPVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.47%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

3.36%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

3.35%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

3.35%

+2.65%

SPIP vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIP vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than VTP's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
5.45%4.09%3.36%3.70%7.05%4.53%1.97%2.91%2.80%3.02%1.88%0.14%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.98%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPIP and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTP has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to SPIP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs VTP's -1.92%.

On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 3.25% vs 3.17% for SPIP. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 3.25% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SPIP.

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.05% for VTP.

VTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIP and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer