PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIP vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIP vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SPIP at 1.49% and BIL at 1.49%. Over the past 10 years, SPIP has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.61%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


SPIP

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
2.61%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
1.49%6.78%2.35%2.98%-12.84%5.80%11.41%9.14%-1.53%3.16%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and BIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.01

The correlation between SPIP and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIP vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIP
SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPIPBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

19.71

-18.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

174.16

-172.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

87.91

-86.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

355.35

-352.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.15

2,817.77

-2,810.63

SPIP vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPIPBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

19.71

-18.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

13.16

-13.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

8.52

-8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

2.78

-2.25

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIPBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-0.78%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-0.01%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-0.01%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-0.10%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

-0.21%

-15.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-0.26%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.00%

+0.70%

Volatility

SPIP vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that SPIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIPBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.05%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

0.13%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

0.20%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

0.26%

+6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

0.26%

+5.75%

SPIP vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIP vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
4.75%4.09%3.36%3.70%7.05%4.53%1.97%2.91%2.80%3.02%1.88%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIP and BIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPIP has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, SPIP leads with 2.61% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, SPIP is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPIP has performed better with a 2.61% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIP is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

SPIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BIL is Government Bonds. SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIP and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer