PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIN vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIN vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIN achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.


SPIN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.52%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIN vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
2.91%14.14%6.09%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIN and QYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.84

The correlation between SPIN and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPIN vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPIN
QYLD

Technology

39.0%
53.8%

Communication Services

12.2%
15.8%

Financial Services

11.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.2%

Industrials

8.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.7%

Energy

2.9%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

SPIN
39.0%
QYLD
53.8%

Communication Services

SPIN
12.2%
QYLD
15.8%

Financial Services

SPIN
11.5%
QYLD
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPIN
8.7%
QYLD
12.3%

Healthcare

SPIN
8.3%
QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

SPIN
8.0%
QYLD
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPIN
3.8%
QYLD
7.7%

Energy

SPIN
2.9%
QYLD
0.6%

Utilities

SPIN
2.3%
QYLD
1.4%

Basic Materials

SPIN
2.2%
QYLD
1.1%

Real Estate

SPIN
1.6%
QYLD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIN vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIN vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPINQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.63

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.84

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

28.36

-19.95

SPIN vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIN and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPINQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.80

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.59

+0.36

Drawdowns

SPIN vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIN drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIN and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPINQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.85%

-24.75%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-4.97%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.06%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-3.84%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

0.85%

+1.50%

Volatility

SPIN vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPINQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.85%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

7.12%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

8.58%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

14.70%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

15.49%

-1.16%

SPIN vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIN vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIN and QYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIN dropped -16.85% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.93% vs 19.71% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.93% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

SPIN is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPIN and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIN and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer