SPIN vs. QQA
SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPIN returned 19.71% vs 32.22% for QQA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPIN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
SPIN vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIN achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 2.91% | 14.14% | 6.09% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIN and QQA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPIN and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPIN vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPIN
QQA
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SPIN
QQA
Communication Services
SPIN
QQA
Financial Services
SPIN
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
SPIN
QQA
Healthcare
SPIN
QQA
Industrials
SPIN
QQA
Consumer Defensive
SPIN
QQA
Energy
SPIN
QQA
Utilities
SPIN
QQA
Basic Materials
SPIN
QQA
Real Estate
SPIN
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIN vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
SPIN
QQA
SPIN vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPIN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.57 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 3.47 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.70 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 16.59 | -8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPIN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.57 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SPIN vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIN drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIN and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.85% | -19.73% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -8.76% | -1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.10% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -2.44% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.95% | +0.40% |
Volatility
SPIN vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) is 1.82%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that SPIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 2.91% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 9.68% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 12.59% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 18.27% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 18.27% | -3.94% |
SPIN vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPIN vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
SPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than QQA's 9.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPIN and QQA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIN dropped -16.85% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 19.71% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QQA.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPIN and 0.29% for QQA.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPIN and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer