PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIN vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIN vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIN achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.


SPIN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.52%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIN vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
2.91%14.14%6.09%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.57%17.24%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIN and QQA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.85

The correlation between SPIN and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPIN vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPIN
QQA

Technology

39.0%
53.8%

Communication Services

12.2%
15.8%

Financial Services

11.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.2%

Industrials

8.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.7%

Energy

2.9%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

SPIN
39.0%
QQA
53.8%

Communication Services

SPIN
12.2%
QQA
15.8%

Financial Services

SPIN
11.5%
QQA
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPIN
8.7%
QQA
12.3%

Healthcare

SPIN
8.3%
QQA
4.2%

Industrials

SPIN
8.0%
QQA
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPIN
3.8%
QQA
7.7%

Energy

SPIN
2.9%
QQA
0.6%

Utilities

SPIN
2.3%
QQA
1.4%

Basic Materials

SPIN
2.2%
QQA
1.1%

Real Estate

SPIN
1.6%
QQA
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIN vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIN vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPINQQADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.57

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

3.47

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.70

-1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

16.59

-8.18

SPIN vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIN and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPINQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.57

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Drawdowns

SPIN vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIN drawdown since its inception was -16.85%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIN and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPINQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.85%

-19.73%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-8.76%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.10%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-2.44%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.95%

+0.40%

Volatility

SPIN vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) is 1.82%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that SPIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPINQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

2.91%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

9.68%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

12.59%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

18.27%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

18.27%

-3.94%

SPIN vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIN vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

SPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than QQA's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIN and QQA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIN dropped -16.85% vs QQA's -19.73%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 19.71% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QQA.

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPIN and 0.29% for QQA.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIN and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer