SPIB vs. QCON
SPIB (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. SPIB is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. SPIB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
SPIB vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPIB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIB vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.07% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIB vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
SPIB
QCON
SPIB vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPIB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPIB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | 0.00% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | 0.00% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
SPIB vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIB | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83% | 0.00% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 0.00% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 0.00% | +4.60% |
SPIB vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPIB vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.42% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPIB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
SPIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPIB and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for SPIB and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer