PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIB vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIB vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.73% return.


SPIB

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.19%
6M
0.47%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
2.73%
ALL TIME*
3.78%

OVT

1D
0.30%
1M
0.24%
6M
2.10%
YTD
2.73%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$505.96K$370.12K$305.03K
$206.12M$185.13M$231.03M

SPIB vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.68%7.91%4.28%7.27%-9.65%-0.76%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
2.73%7.61%7.44%7.73%-9.68%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIB and OVT is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021

0.66

The correlation between SPIB and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIB vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPIB
SPIB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPIB vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIBOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.90

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

10.72

-5.98

SPIB vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the OVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIB and OVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIB vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, which is greater than OVT's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIBOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-13.59%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-1.55%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-3.55%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.60%

-13.59%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.29%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-3.31%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.56%

+0.10%

Volatility

SPIB vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 0.84%, while Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIBOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.22%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

2.78%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

3.71%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.49%

4.69%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.54%

+0.06%

SPIB vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIB vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than OVT's 7.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
7.62%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.49%4.42%4.41%3.84%2.65%1.58%2.18%3.03%3.04%2.79%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIB and OVT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVT has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to SPIB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs OVT's -13.59%.

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 2.83% vs 1.62% for SPIB. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 2.83% return vs 1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 4.49% for SPIB.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPIB and 0.80% for OVT.

OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIB and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer