PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIB vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIB vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has underperformed HYGH with an annualized return of 2.80%, while HYGH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.


SPIB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
2.80%

HYGH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.56%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.56%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIB vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.55%7.91%4.28%7.27%-9.65%-1.24%7.69%10.23%-0.49%3.76%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.33%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%11.09%-0.85%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIB and HYGH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2014

0.03

The correlation between SPIB and HYGH shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIB vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIB
SPIB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIB vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIBHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.80

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

18.77

-11.17

SPIB vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIB and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIB vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIBHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-23.88%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-1.62%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.18%

-8.06%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.80%

-8.24%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-23.88%

+8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.08%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-2.22%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.41%

+0.19%

Volatility

SPIB vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) at 0.63%. This indicates that SPIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIBHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.63%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

2.81%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

3.64%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

7.08%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

8.30%

-3.70%

SPIB vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIB vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than HYGH's 6.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.42%4.41%3.84%2.65%1.58%2.18%3.03%3.04%2.79%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIB and HYGH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPIB has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to HYGH (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

On 10-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.48% vs 2.80% for SPIB. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, HYGH has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.46% for SPIB.

SPIB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. SPIB tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate, while HYGH tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPIB and 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIB and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer