SPHY vs. SPLB
SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) and SPLB (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while SPLB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHY returned 4.86%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for SPLB. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPHY charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPLB.
Performance
SPHY vs. SPLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than SPLB's -2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHY has outperformed SPLB with an annualized return of 4.86%, while SPLB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.
SPHY
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.96%
SPLB
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- -3.57%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $261.99M | $177.04M | $128.39M | |
| $53.06M | $53.93M | $58.75M |
SPHY vs. SPLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 2.13% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -10.57% | 5.61% | 6.65% | 13.16% | -3.35% | 7.35% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | -2.02% | 7.05% | -1.74% | 11.20% | -25.68% | -1.99% | 13.47% | 23.49% | -7.35% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHY and SPLB is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2012 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, SPHY and SPLB have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHY vs. SPLB — Risk / Return Rank
SPHY
SPLB
SPHY vs. SPLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHY | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.01 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 0.06 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 0.13 | +10.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHY vs. SPLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum SPLB drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and SPLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHY | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -34.46% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -5.54% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.85% | -10.23% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.29% | -34.46% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.97% | -34.46% | +12.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -17.03% | +16.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -8.07% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.51% | -1.97% |
Volatility
SPHY vs. SPLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) is 0.79%, while SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that SPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHY | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 2.24% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 6.10% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 7.84% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 12.69% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 12.92% | -5.09% |
SPHY vs. SPLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHY has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLB's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHY vs. SPLB - Dividend Comparison
SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than SPLB's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.23% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.60% | 5.25% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHY and SPLB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLB has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to SPHY (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs SPLB's -34.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPHY leads with 4.86% vs 1.55% for SPLB. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPLB.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 5.60% for SPLB.
SPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPLB is Corporate Bonds. SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPHY and 0.07% for SPLB.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHY and SPLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer