PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLB vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLB has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 2.19%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


SPLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.33%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
2.19%

SCHD

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
17.24%
6M
16.44%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.28%7.05%-1.74%11.20%-25.68%-1.99%13.47%23.49%-7.35%12.26%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.24%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLB and SCHD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.04

The correlation between SPLB and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLB
SPLB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLBSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

5.24

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

12.71

-9.87

SPLB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLBSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-33.37%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-4.61%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-16.13%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-16.85%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-33.37%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-2.86%

-11.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-3.31%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.90%

+0.32%

Volatility

SPLB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) is 1.94%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that SPLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLBSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

3.58%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

7.74%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.96%

11.09%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

14.36%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.96%

16.73%

-3.77%

SPLB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than SCHD's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.31%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.36%5.25%5.20%4.60%4.53%3.00%3.01%3.79%4.50%4.06%4.34%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to SPLB (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 2.19% for SPLB. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPLB.

SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 3.31% for SCHD.

SPLB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHD is Dividend. SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPLB and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLB and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer