PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHY vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHY vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 14.96% return.


SPHY

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
5.04%

QQQM

1D
-4.78%
1M
1.38%
YTD
14.96%
6M
13.04%
1Y
35.13%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHY vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
1.24%8.59%8.54%12.81%-10.57%5.61%5.31%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
14.96%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHY and QQQM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.65

The correlation between SPHY and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHY vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHY
QQQM

Financial Services

99.9%
0.2%

Energy

0.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

SPHY
99.9%
QQQM
0.2%

Energy

SPHY
0.1%
QQQM
0.6%

Basic Materials

SPHY

-

QQQM
1.1%

Communication Services

SPHY

-

QQQM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHY

-

QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPHY

-

QQQM
7.7%

Healthcare

SPHY

-

QQQM
4.2%

Industrials

SPHY

-

QQQM
2.8%

Real Estate

SPHY

-

QQQM
0.1%

Technology

SPHY

-

QQQM
53.8%

Utilities

SPHY

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHY vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHY
SPHY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHY vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHYQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.95

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

11.24

+1.65

SPHY vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHY and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHYQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.12

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.75

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Drawdowns

SPHY vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHYQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-35.04%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-11.96%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-22.70%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

-35.04%

+19.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-5.49%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-8.24%

+5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.13%

-2.60%

Volatility

SPHY vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) is 1.15%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that SPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHYQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

6.68%

-5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

13.07%

-10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

16.66%

-12.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

22.33%

-15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.89%

22.20%

-14.31%

SPHY vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHY has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHY vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.44%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
7.29%7.38%7.80%7.30%6.47%5.13%5.63%5.73%4.09%4.41%4.27%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHY and QQQM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to SPHY (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.79% vs 4.33% for SPHY. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.79% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.

SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.29%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

SPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPHY and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHY and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer