SPHQ vs. XRMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI).
SPHQ and XRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. XRMI is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both SPHQ and XRMI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.46% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 5.40% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | -2.13% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 4.22% | -14.06% | 2.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's -2.13% return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
XRMI
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHQ | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.62 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 0.89 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.80 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 2.72 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHQ | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.62 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.26 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and XRMI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than XRMI's 12.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.18% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.78% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and XRMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -15.31% | -42.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -5.02% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -3.86% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -6.10% | -4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.47% | +1.01% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.68%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 2.68% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 4.51% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 6.88% | +10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 6.99% | +9.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 6.99% | +10.82% |