SPHQ vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.01%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 15.01%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

SPHQ

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 15.48%
• 6M: 16.06%
• 1Y: 23.22%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 14.54%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	15.48%	13.25%	25.44%	24.83%	-15.76%	28.03%	17.36%	33.64%	-7.10%	19.10%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and XMMO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005	0.83

The correlation between SPHQ and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPHQ	XMMO
Technology	28.1%	16.7%
Industrials	24.3%	41.1%
Consumer Defensive	15.4%	0.5%
Financial Services	13.3%	2.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	4.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	7.2%
Communication Services	2.0%	1.6%
Utilities	1.0%	5.8%
Energy	0.7%	7.7%
Real Estate	-	6.1%

Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 61

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPHQ	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.99	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.77	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	4.45	-1.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	18.21	-7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPHQ	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	1.99	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.78	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.89	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.58	-0.04

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHQ	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.83%	-55.37%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-8.34%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.57%	-24.93%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-27.91%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	-36.74%	+5.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-9.45%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	2.04%	+0.04%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 3.49%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPHQ	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	7.82%	-4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	15.54%	-5.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	18.71%	-6.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	21.45%	-5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	22.27%	-4.41%

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPHQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.04%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPHQ and XMMO in my portfolio?

SPHQ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPHQ or XMMO?

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, SPHQ or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 15.01% for SPHQ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPHQ or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPHQ or XMMO?

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPHQ or XMMO?

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between SPHQ and XMMO?

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while XMMO is Momentum. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.