SPHQ vs. SCHP
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.27%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 15.27%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.79% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SCHP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.07 |
The correlation between SPHQ and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SCHP
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Industrials
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Financial Services
SPHQ
SCHP
Healthcare
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SCHP
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Communication Services
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Utilities
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Energy
SPHQ
SCHP
-
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SCHP
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.45 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 7.41 | +4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -14.26% | -43.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -1.93% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -4.48% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -14.26% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -14.26% | -17.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -3.93% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 0.64% | +1.45% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 1.02% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 2.24% | +8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 3.30% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 6.12% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 5.59% | +12.31% |
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SCHP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.03% for SCHP.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer