PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 100.79% return.


SPHQ

1D
1.26%
1M
6.56%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.32%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
14.98%

HIBL

1D
5.48%
1M
41.77%
YTD
100.79%
6M
114.67%
1Y
310.77%
3Y*
63.26%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.16%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%5.91%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
100.79%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and HIBL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.78

The correlation between SPHQ and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
HIBL

Technology

28.1%
45.8%

Industrials

24.3%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
0.6%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
12.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
3.2%

Energy

0.7%
2.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
HIBL
45.8%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
HIBL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
HIBL
0.6%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
HIBL
12.5%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
HIBL
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
HIBL
12.9%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
HIBL
4.6%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
HIBL
3.7%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
HIBL
3.2%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
HIBL
2.2%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

HIBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQHIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

4.74

-2.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

3.80

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

10.27

-7.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.50

37.74

-26.24

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

4.74

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.15

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.25

+0.28

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-88.27%

+30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-31.39%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-69.66%

+53.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-81.58%

+56.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-44.22%

+33.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

8.54%

-6.46%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 3.55%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 20.94%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

20.94%

-17.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

50.39%

-40.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

66.14%

-53.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

82.16%

-65.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

91.92%

-74.05%

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than HIBL's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.15%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and HIBL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (20.94%) compared to SPHQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.73% vs 12.35% for HIBL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.73% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.74 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer