PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHD vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHD vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHD achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 15.22% return.


SPHD

1D
2.11%
1M
4.57%
6M
10.03%
YTD
13.60%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
7.34%

QQQM

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.18%
6M
13.83%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHD vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
13.60%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%9.48%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
15.22%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHD and QQQM is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.28

The correlation between SPHD and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHD vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHD vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHDQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.30

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

8.14

-2.89

SPHD vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHD and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHD vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHDQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-35.04%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-11.96%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-22.70%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-35.04%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.28%

+5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-8.15%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.37%

-0.39%

Volatility

SPHD vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) is 4.95%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that SPHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHDQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

7.39%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

15.34%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

18.54%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

22.65%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

22.30%

-4.65%

SPHD vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHD vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.45%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHD and QQQM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to SPHD (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 15.34% vs 8.36% for SPHD. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.45% for QQQM.

SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHD and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer