SPHD vs. FDV
SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. SPHD is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPHD returned 11.42%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for FDV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
SPHD vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHD achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than FDV's 11.72% return.
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.36% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHD and FDV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SPHD and FDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHD vs. FDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHD
FDV
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
SPHD
FDV
Consumer Defensive
SPHD
FDV
Financial Services
SPHD
FDV
Energy
SPHD
FDV
Utilities
SPHD
FDV
Communication Services
SPHD
FDV
Healthcare
SPHD
FDV
Consumer Cyclical
SPHD
FDV
Technology
SPHD
FDV
Industrials
SPHD
FDV
Basic Materials
SPHD
-
FDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHD vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
SPHD
FDV
SPHD vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.78 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 12.05 | -9.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.01 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SPHD vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -16.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.39% | -16.70% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -5.70% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -12.55% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.37% | -0.39% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -3.93% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.79% | +1.14% |
Volatility
SPHD vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) at 2.82%. This indicates that SPHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.82% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 6.82% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 10.74% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 12.65% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 12.65% | +4.99% |
SPHD vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHD vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FDV's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.62% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHD and FDV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHD has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to FDV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs FDV's -16.70%.
On 3-year performance, FDV leads with 14.78% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDV has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.56% for FDV.
SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.50% for FDV.
FDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHD and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer