SPHD vs. FDV
SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. SPHD is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPHD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
SPHD vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHD and FDV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHD vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
SPHD
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPHD vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHD vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.39% | -3.33% | -38.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.78% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -1.16% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility
SPHD vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHD | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.45% | 12.15% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 12.15% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 12.15% | +5.49% |
SPHD vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHD vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than FDV's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.60% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPHD and FDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.27% for FDV.
SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.50% for FDV.
Find the right allocation for SPHD and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer